![]() ![]() ![]() In one of the first missions, you take on the role of a tank driver searching for spark plugs to repair his tank’s engine. You’ll easily roll through the entire story in a few play sessions. It’s pretty short as far as single player shooters go. This isn’t a linear experience instead of playing as a one-man army tearing through enemy lines, you play as multiple soldiers across the war’s various fronts ranging from France to the Middle East. ![]() “Battlefield 1,” however, is the first game in the series to create a genuinely emotional narrative. They just didn’t have that “Battlefield” feel. “1942” didn’t even have one when it launched and when full-on campaigns finally arrived around with “Battlefield: Bad Company,” they felt like cheap “Call of Duty” knock-offs. That’s because solo campaigns always took a backseat. In fact, I’ve played nearly every entry in the series since “Battlefield 1942” first debuted in 2002, and like anyone who’s ever played a ”Battlefield” game, the one thing that kept getting me to sign up for another tour of duty was the series’ multiplayer. So should you look past them and sign up? Life during wartimeįull disclosure: I’ve been a fan of the “Battlefield” franchise for some time. And then there’s the game’s multiplayer, where up to 64 players fight across fully destructible maps complete with colossal zeppelins and pitched battles for inches of dirt. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |